Note (by Robert Schleip): The
following is a rather technical report about the research of Hubert Godard and
his colleagues at the National Cancer Institute of Milano/Italy. It deals
specifically with electromyographic research about 3 versions of an "unbendable
arm" exercise with women after mastectomy. There is another interesting
and more extensive article at our website about Hubert's work at Kevin Frank: Tonic
Function..
Back to the article
collection of somatics.de
NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL
STUDY OF THE E-MOTION
H. Godard*, C. Pirovano°, L.
Bedodi°°, A. Cola°°, G. Galperti°°, R.Sensi°° and G. Martino°.
* Universite de Paris VIII Saint
Denis.
° METIS - Medicine and Memory -
International Center of Studies and Therapies for Women's Health - Milan.
°° Rehabilitation Dept. - National
Cancer Institute - Milan.
INTRODUCTION
Research conducted over the course of
twelve years an the physical and psychological damage in women operated on for
breast cancer led us to study some inexplicable phenomena related to
oncological trauma and to surgery (1,2,3).
We found
post-surgical limitations of the shoulder girdle in daily movement that could
not be explained through muscular, articular, electromyographical and
radiological examination. In the classical clinical approach, only the force
and amplitude of the basic movements of the joint are measured.
Observation of the subjects
while walking and while performing the movements of daily life revealed changes
in the coordinative structures (acquired sensory‑motor automatisms) that
were not reflected in the voluntary action tests. When walking, 65% of the
breast‑operated women showed a loss of pendular motion of the homolateral
arm. From the observers' perspective, the arm looked anchored to the trunk or
paretic (like dead). When asked to move the arms symmetrically while walking
the patients performed the movements without difficulty. In most cases the loss
of pendular motion of the arm when walking, causes over time and by
compensation, a malfunction of one hip joint.
A second series of experiments
was carried out with patients in the preoperative phase and with a sample of
healthy women; 50% of the women with breast cancer in the pre‑surgical
period presented reduced pendulousness in comparison with 10% in the healthy
group (4). The pendulousness further decreased after surgery, in some cases as
far as complete arrest of the arm.
A third series of experiments
was conducted with post‑surgical subjects, without functional or
articular deficit, participating in body‑mind therapy groups (immediately
post-surgery and during subsequent radiation therapy). We observed that these
patients had less ability in space directionality (exteroception) (5), in space
projection [ex‑proprioception: Awareness of body positions in reference
to the spacial surroundings) (6) and in the ability to anticipate an action
with the arm on the side of the operated breast.
Following Damasio (7), Edelman
(8), Reed (9), we suspected a link between emotion, perception and the loss of
movement in our oncological patients. Starting from these works we
investigated, through a new trial with the EMG, the neurophysiological
implications of the emotional situations and of the fluctuations in perception
in the context during the movement (e-motion).
Specifically the aim of this
study was:
- to understand the
relationship between the strength in the motion and the organization of
the projection in space.
- to evaluate the
importance of the balance between proprioception and exteroception as crucial anticipatory
factors of the movement.
- to focus on the implication of
the relational context regarding the subject during the classical
diagnostic‑prognostic electromyography.
- to improve the techniques
of rehabilitation by paying attention to the individual's emotional
perceptual organization.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
The experiment was carried out an 10
healthy volunteer subjects: 5 men and 5 women, aged between 28 and 46 years and
without previous neuro‑motor deficits.
We chose to evaluate the
overall capacity of extension of the forearm against resistance in several
different contexts.
Strength of extension of the
forearm is based an 1he work of the triceps brachii which can be inhibited or
facilitated by the action of the antagonist: the biceps brachii. The stronger
the work of the antagonist, the weaker the overall capacity of extension. The
amount of biceps action is thus taken as the indicator of an inhibition in the
movement.
The triceps could be
considered a muscle with a clearly prevailing phasic, alpha mediated activity
and it has, as antagonist, the biceps, a tonic muscle implicated in the
gravitational equilibrium with an important gamma activity. The two muscles
could be considered "pure" antagonists because the articulation of
the elbow is structured in way that allows few additional movements during the
flexion‑extension of the forearm.
The neuro‑physiological
investigation was carried out with electromyography, by concentric needle
electrodes of Adrian and Bronk. The recruitment pattern was recorded
continuously during maximum voluntary activity. with sweep speed of 20 msec.
and amplitude of motor units of 0.2 mV per division. (Some examples of the
electromyographical traces that were recorded are shown below)
Subjects, in seated position, were
asked to support the back of the wrist an a bracket and to maintain the
extension of the forearm resisting the examiner's attempt to flex lt. ( test
against resistance).
·
Initially the request was to exert the
maximum possible extension of the forearm against resistance (test A).
- The experiment was then repeated
asking the subject to imagine the arm
extending
with a horizontal aim in space before and during the movement in order
to
modify the intentional perception within the context ("Imagine that your
fingers
lengthen
out to reach the wall of the room" or using other visual‑kinesthetic
modality.
"that your fingers emit a beam of light that reaches the wall "). As
in the
first
test, during this trial the examiner tried to flex the arm of the subject (test
B).
- Finally we repeated test B. this time
with a disturbance of the visual spatial
projection,
by interposing an obstacle between the subject's arm and the wall. An
examiner
passed through the aiming field of the subject (test C).
RESULTS
During
maximum voluntary activity (test A): In the 10 subjects examined the
electromyographic examination highlighted an unexpected, clean activity of
biceps brachii (antagonist of the movement) while the examiner registered the strength
of the extension of the forearm against resistance. The recruitment pattern
changed from discrete activity to a reduced interference.
With a spatial projective aim
(test B), in all the examined subjects, the electromyographic data and the
examiner's perception of the strength of extension clearly changed. The examiner
perceived an "invincible" resistance, 3-4 times stronger than in the
A-test , while the EMG showed a clear reduction in the recruitment of motor
units in the biceps with patterns of single unit potentials and at times
complete electrical silence. '
Setting an obstacle to modify
the spatial context (test C): In all the examined subjects the EMG activity in
the biceps brachii reappeared although in a moderate way relative to test A.
There were patterns of discrete activity and the strength against resistance
was also somewhat reduced.

DISCUSSION
In the A-test the
electrical activity registered in the biceps brachii (antagonist muscle during
the maximum extension of the forearm) could not be caused by the will of the
subject who is actively trying to obtain the maximum motor Performance. The
electrical activity of the biceps could be explained by the tonic-emotional
arousal (increase of the gamma tone) linked to the context of struggle during
the extension of the forearm which modifies the proprioceptive/exproprioceptive
balance necessary for efficient movement. Without an exproprioceptive
reference, the subject no longer perceives the reality of the actual context
(which includes the external) but only the relationship with the examiner.(a‑test:emotion)
Since the two muscles contract together, a Part of the pure extensor activity
of the triceps is lost in the conflict with the flexion of the forearm induced
by the biceps. In other words, a Part of the potential energy of the triceps
has been transformed into caloric, not productive energy (entropy) instead of
being used for the movement.
In
the B-test the addition of a clear exproprioception before and
during the movement ameliorates immediately and often completely the situation
in the observed subjects. Clinically the examiner registers the maximum
strength of the triceps and the EMG reports the electrical' silence of the
biceps. This is due to a better relationship between proprio /ex-proprioception.
When we introduce the
projective and aiming element we suppress or clearly reduce the gamma activity
of the biceps, while the triceps becomes wholly constituted from kinetic pure
energy . We can say that the ability to project in the space suppresses the
unconscious inhibition, the unaware activity that conflicts with the
voluntarily programmed action. The relationship is then triangulated for the
examinees who feel their arm, face the examiner and relate to the surrounding.
This situation brings them to the maximum potential of action (B test :
ex-motion).
In the C-test,
the evidence, in most cases, a reactivation in the biceps brachii
simultaneously with the reduction of the spatial projection, confirms the
influence of the subject's evaluation of the context and the symbolic dimension
(conscious and unconscious) an the tensional organization of the shoulder
girdle. Over time this situation of poor spatial projection (absence of
projects for a part of the body) decreases the sensorial afference stimuli and
leads to a structural modification of the related primary sensory cortex's
territory. Merzenich et al. (10,11) demonstrated the rapidity of the
transformation of these territories in absence of the afferent stimuli. The
impoverishment of the sensory cortex then decreases, in its turn, the ability
of the motor cortex's retroactive loops linked with the sensory area. The work
of these retroactive loops represents, according to Weisendanger (12), 98.5% of
motor cortex activity. Thus a vicious circle is formed which can progress as
far as the complete disappearance of a motor activity without any evident
somatic injury.
CONCLUSION
We registered, with EMG, the
different potentiality of the muscular activity submitting the subjects to
motor resistance in various perceptive/projective tests.
When we ask the subject to
only counteract the examiner we noticed a paradoxal electrical activity in the
antagonist muscle which reduced the strength potentiality and brought rapid
fatigue. The relationship was only oppositional and dual because of poor ex‑proprioceptive
references (emotion).
Without spatial attention, a
weak force was registered. This is due to the emotional situation that elicited
a lost of spacial references and an accentuation of the gamma activity
increasing the spindle response (modification of the firing point of the
stretch reflex by the gamma loop) of the antagonist muscle.
When we ask the subject to
extend the forearm with a directionality and a spatial projection of the hand,
we registered the full strength of the agonist muscle, with absence of activity
of the antagonist. The action by the exteroceptive and exproprioceptive
references became triangulated and therefore potentially maximized (ex‑motion).
This EMG study helps us to
understand why many of the oncological patients that we observed lost some
basics movements, like pendular motion of the arm, without clinical
explanation. This loss came from the reduced capacity to have movement projects
of a part of the body due to the physical and emotional trauma in this part.
Over time, the repetition of this situation transforms sensory territory and
organization (transformation of the body image) and then motor capacity.
Our
neuro-physiological results emphasize the importance of considering the role of
sensory activity in motor rehabilitation; clarify the relationship between the
quantity of muscular strength and the quality of the projection in the space
(proprioception and emotion / ex-proprioception and ex-motion); calls into
question the value of the standard approach of studies using EMG that disregard
the importance of the context during clinical evaluation; emphasizes the
importance of a program of rehabilitation that gives attention to the patient's
emotional / perceptual organization.
REFERENCES
1.
Martino G., Prevenzione e terapia degli esitt. In U. Veronesi (Ed.) : Manuale di
senologia oncologica. Miiano: Masson, 1993, pp. 431‑442.
2. Martino G.,II recupero del paziente oncologico:
aspetti psicologici e riabilitativi. In
G. Beretta, E. Ghislandi, G. Luporini, A. Scanni (eds.) Atti del XV Corso di Aggiornamento
in Oncologia Medica. Milano, 26‑29 giugno 1994. Milano: AIOM, 1994, pp.
439‑443.
3. Merson M.. Pirovano C., Balzarini A.,
Luini A., Biasi S., Galimberti V., Genitoni V., MuscoUno G., Veronesi P., The
preservation of minor pectoralis muscle in axillary dissection for breast
cancer: functional and cosmetic evaluation. Eur.J. Surg. Oncol. 18, 215‑218,
1992.
4. Godard H., Le geste manquant. In: Revue Internationale de Psychanalyse, Etats corps,
Ed. érès, Paris, 5, 1994, pp. 63‑75.
5. Lee D.N., On the functions of vision.
In: H. Pick and E. Saltzman (Eds.): Modes of perceiving. Hillsdale, N.J.:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1978.
6. Fitch H.L., Tuller B., Turvey M.T.,
The Bernstein Perspective: III. Tuning of Coordinative Structures with Special
Reference to Perception. In J.A. Scott Kelso(ed.) Human Motor Behaviour: An
Introduction. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,1982.
7. Damasio A. R., L'erreur de Descartes,
Editions Odile Jacob, Paris, 1995.
8. Edelman G. M., Biologie de la
Conscience, Editions Odile Jacob, Paris, 1992
9. Reed E. S., An Outline of a Theory of
Action System, Journal of Motor Behavior, Vol.14 No 2, 98‑134, 1982.
10. Wall J.T., Kaas J.H., Sur M., Nelson
R.J., Felleman ‑D. J. and Merzenich M.M., Functional
reorganization in somatosensory cortical areas 3b and 2 of adult monkeys after
median nerve repair: possible relationships to sensory recovery in humans. J.
Neuroscience 6, 218‑233, 1986.
11. Merzenich, M.M., Recanzone, G. H.,
Jenkins, W.M., and Nudo, R.J. How the brain functionally rewires itsef in
Arbib, M.A., Robinson,J.A. :Natural and Atipical Parallel Computation Mit‑Press
Cambrige* 1990 , pp 177‑210.
12. Weisendanger M., Contröie cortical
des mouvements et régulation par les afférences proprioceptives, Journal de
physiologie, Paris, 1976.
All the Authors have worked
(and some are still working) at the Rehabilitation Department of the National
Cancer Institute of Milan where for more than twelve years they have worked to
ameliorate the quality of life of people with cancer. Hubert Godard directed a
seven year training program for the rehabilitation team of the INT on
bio-mechanical, functional and symbolic aspects of movement. He led this
research which was coordinated by Gemma Martino and financed by the CNRA.C.R.0.
n. 92.02361 .
- This
article is posted at this website www.somatics.de
with the kind permission of Hubert Godard.. Please respect the copyright
of the authors and do not copy or distribute without clear
permission.
- Anybody
interested in copying the digital text data from here into their website
(with the authors' permission): a small share of the scanning costs will
be appreciated. Contact: schleip@somatics.de
Back to the article collection of
somatics.de